This book presents a developed theory of how national lawyers can approach, understand,
and make use of foreign law. Its theme is pursued through a set of detailed essays which
look at the courts as well as business practice and, with the help of statistics,
demonstrate what type of academic work has any impact on the ‘real’ world. Engaging
with Foreign Law thus aims to carve out a new niche for comparative law in this era of
globalisation, and may also be the only book which deals in some depth with both private
and public law in countries such as England, Germany, France, South Africa, and the United
States.
Sir Basil Markesinis QC is a Fellow of the British Academy, a Foreign
Fellow of the Accademia dei Lincei of Rome, the Royal Belgian Academy of Arts and Sciences
in Brussels, the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in Amsterdam, and a
Correspondng Fellow of the Academy of Athens and the Academie des Sciences Morales et
Politques in France. He is a Bencher of Gray’s Inn.
Professor Jörg Fedtke studied law and political science at the
University of Hamburg in Germany. He held the Chair for Comparative Law at University
College London, where he was also Director of the Institute of Global Law. He is now AN
Yiannopoulos Professor in Comparative Law at Tulane University Law School in the United
States.
Table of Contents
Preface to the Second Edition v
Acknowledgements 000
About the Authors ix
List of Abbreviations 000
Table of Cases 000
1. Reflections on the State of Comparative Law I: The Twilight of the Heroes 1
1. Of Ghettoes and Smart Neighbourhoods 1
2. Decline 4
(a) The Absence of a Defining Treatise, an Inspiring Thesis, or a New
Methodology 4
(i) France 4
(ii) The Germanic World 7
(iii) England 8
(b) The Human Factor 11
(i) The Continued Utility of Studying Roman Law 13
(ii) How the Continued Study of Roman Law has Harmed both its
High Priests and their Work 15
(iii) Modern Attempts to Salvage Parts of Roman Law 18
(iv) Other English Reasons for the Decline of Comparative Law 20
(c) The Comparatists in Germany and the United States 24
(d) The Practitioner Comparatist: An Untapped Gold Mine 28
3. Not Leaving a Working Method 29
4. An Epilogue to the Idea of Decline 32
2. Reflections on the State of Comparative Law II: The Era of Societal Needs 35
1. The Emergence of a Strategy 35
2. The Rabel Method Over Time 37
(a) Particularism 37
(b) Statics 38
(c) Process 39
(d) Neglect of Public Law 41
3. Functional Specificity: More of the Same Medicine 42
4. Old (Bad) Habits and New (Silly) Threats 45
(a) Eurocentrism—Is it a Vice? 46
(b) Why Focus on Some Systems Only? 48
(c) The Opacity of Post-Modernism 53
(d) Law and Philosophy, and How to Use the Latter in Conjunction with
Comparative Law 58
(e) Comparative Law and Sociology 61
(f) Comparative Law and Anthropology—A Suffocating Embrace? 65
(g) The Shared Error of the Old and New Schools 66
5. From Heroes to Movements of Contemporary Globalisation 70
3. Spreading the Gospel (and the Name of the Evangelist) 77
1. Aims to be Pursued 77
(a) The Importance of Language 78
(b) Where One is Cited 79
(c) Inflating Reputation 81
2. Warnings and Caveats 81
3. Some Raw Data 86
4. Drawing the First Lessons 90
(a) Lesson One—Citations Need to be Adjusted Downwards; Each Author
Needs to be Given Individual Attention 90
(b) Lesson Two—Reputation and Legacy in Comparative Law 99
(c) Lesson Three—The Power of School Citation and Exaggeration 103
5. First Conclusions 108
6. Reputology for the Years 2001 to 2005 110
7. Citation Figures of British Comparatists and Non-Comparatists 111
8. The Comparatists During the Years 2001 to 2005 114
9. Commentary: Showing in Literature 117
10. Commentary (bis): Showing in the Courts 123
11. A Postscript 125
4. South Africa 127
1. Legal Transplants 127
2. Constitutional Transition and Foreign Influence 130
3. The ‘Constitutional State Principle’ or Rechtsstaatsprinzip 132
4. Human Rights Protection 134
(a) The Essential Content Clause 134
(b) Horizontal Effect or Drittwirkung 136
(c) The Protection of Economic Activity 147
(d) Juristic Persons 152
(e) Allgemeine Handlungsfreiheit—a General Right to Freedom? 154
5. Federalism 157
6. Lessons from the South African Experience 159
5. The Situation in Germany 163
1. The Limited Radiating Effect of German Law 163
2. Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law in Germany 164
3. Judicial Recourse to Comparative Literature 174
(a) Positivistic Tradition 176
(b) The Prevailing Methods of Interpretation 176
(c) Competing Sources of Comparative Material 177
4. Comparative Law in the Field of Legislative Law Reform 177
5. ‘Applied’ Comparative Law in Germany—Some Tentative Conclusions 182
6. The Reluctance to Borrow Ideas from Abroad: Two Strange Bedfellows—
The United States and France 187
1. Opening Remarks 187
2. The United States—The Open Society 188
3. The United States—Constitutional Law and Statutory Interpretation 190
4. The Divided (Supreme) Court 193
5. Consistency in Opposing Foreign Law on the Grounds that it is Irrelevant 195
6. Strongly Phrased Rejection of Relevance of Foreign Law 198
7. The Stimulating Side of ‘Negativism’ 201
8. Wider Reasons which may Help the Current Climate of Insularity
Spread Further 203
9. Comparison with other World Courts 206
10. Comparisons with France 206
(a) General Remarks 206
(b) Issues to be Resolved 212
(i) Comparative Law in France: Its Present State 212
(ii) Who is Able to Take the Lead in Promoting the Use of Foreign
Law in France? 215
(iii) How to Make the Use of Foreign Law More Attractive 220
11. Comparative Postscript 225
7. The Focused Approach in Public Law: A Look at English and French Law 229
1. Introduction: The General and the Particular 229
2. A Study in Parallel 231
3. The Reasoning of the Courts 235
4. In Search of a Rapprochement 237
(a) Policy Reasons and Concepts in Decisions Involving the Liability of
Public Bodies 237
(b) A Divergence in Fundamental (Political) Philosophy? 242
5. Wider Conclusions 248
8. Another Lesson on Packaging: The Grey Zone where Tort Law Overlaps with
Administrative Law 253
1. Introductory Observations 253
2. The Non-Liability Rule for Omissions in the ‘Highway’ Cases 258
(a) Unclear Judgments or Conclusionary Justifications 261
(b) Citing Lower Courts which are in Agreement 263
(c) Welfare Law Legislation 264
(d) A Missed Point? 266
3. Further Doubts about Lord Hoffmann’s Reasoning in Gorringe 266
4. The Structural Approach to the Breach of Statutory Duties and its
Justification in Germany 272
5. Recent German Case Law 276
(a) Social Services 276
(b) Highway Authorities 278
(c) Prisons 279
6. The Economical Consequences of ‘State Liability’ (Staatshaftung) in
Germany 281
(a) How Successful are Plaintiffs and how much Compensation is Paid by
Public Bodies? 283
(b) The Overall Amount of Compensation Paid out by German Public
Authorities Each Year 284
(i) Compensation on the Basis of the NATO Statute 284
(ii) Public Traffic (Verkehrsteilnahme) 284
(iii) Medical Liability 285
(iv) Compensation on the Basis of Community Law 285
(v) Other Factors 286
(c) A Closer Look at the Claims Made against Public Authorities and
Subsequent Litigation 287
(i) The Number of Claims, the Average Single Demand, and the
Average Single Payment 287
(ii) Cases which Reach the Courts 289
(iii) Chances of Success in Court and Reasons for Failure 291
7. Some Tentative Conclusions 294
8. Postscript 303
9. Foreign Law Inspiring National Law: Lessons from Greatorex v Greatorex 305
1. Introduction 305
2. The German Model 308
3. The Application of the German Ideas to Greatorex 310
4. Unresolved Questions 311
5. The American Dimension 314
6. Some Tentative Conclusions 317
10. Comparative Law in Commercial Practice 323
1. Commercial Interests in a Globalised Environment 323
(a) Standardisation 325
(b) Forum Shopping 327
(c) Internal Regulation 329
2. Uniform Law and Comparative Methodology 331
(a) Unification 331
(b) The European Union as a special case of regional unification 333
(c) Harmonisation 334
3. Some Selected Examples 337
(a) Standardisation and the Local Pitfalls of the ‘World Wide’ Web 338
(b) Forum Shopping 340
(i) Private Limited Companies 341
(ii) Cross-Border Insolvency Strategies 342
(iii) Outsourcing 343
(c) Internal Regulation: Sarbanes-Oxley 344
4. Lessons for Comparative Law as a Discipline 347
11. Reflecting on the Future: The Subject and its Teachers 351
1. Opening Remarks 351
(a) Speaking One’s Mind 351
(b) Specialised Knowledge and Wider Culture 352
(c) Political Aims and Comparative Law 356
(d) Political and Economic Structures and Comparative Law: A Postscript
to the Previous Sub-Heading 362
2. Growing Interaction in a Shrinking World—Will it Help or Stunt
Comparative Law? 364
(a) Globalisation—A Multi-Polar Source of Converging Law 364
(b) Will the Increase of Available Information Make Comparison
Superfluous? 369
3. What Should We be Doing? 370
4. Prophesying the Future—A World of Different Speeds 372
(a) Shades of Internationalism 372
(b) Introspection or Arrogant Self-Sufficiency? 376
Appendix I: Correspondence between Lord Atkin and Professor HC Gutteridge 383
Appendix II: The Law Commission and Comparative Law During the last 10 Years 387
Appendix III: Description of Databases Searched 397
Appendix IV: Journals Included in Westlaw’s JLR Database: 825 Journals 403
Bibliography 427
Index 441
442 pages, Paperback